(13, 19), (26, 6), (20, 12), (8, 24), (16, 16), (0, 32).
First we would divide the pile a few times, then work backwards, and attempt to fill in the gap between the two parts. This does seem like a good approach, but perhaps not the best one. At first I did not think this would be possible for all numbers in the range, [0, 32], but it turns out I was wrong. I also do not really see a different way of doing this, but I do remember different methods being discussed at the end of lecture, I just don't really remember what they were. A tree diagram was also mentioned on the handout, but I just figured that would be a different way to organize the results while still using the brute method approach. Overall, I think this was an interesting problem, and one that I did not expect to be true as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment